Federal Beef Contractor To Pay $600K for Hiring Discrimination Based on Race, Gender
November 7, 2011
In a Carson, California employment attorney blog from last month, our lawyers discussed a recent gender discrimination lawsuit settlement, one of the largest in the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) history--where Tyson Fresh Meats Inc. agreed to pay $2.25 million to more than 1,650 female job applicants, who were discriminated against based on their gender, and denied equal employment opportunities within the company.
In another recent press release from the OFCCP, Caviness Beef Packers Ltd., has also agreed to a discrimination settlement that will resolve charges that the company engaged in race and gender discrimination against 746 qualified Asian, white, black and female job applicants in the federal contractor's two facilities for meat processing.
According to the OFCCP's Director, Patricia A. Shiu, discrimination is not tolerated by employers who are given lucrative government contracts. Caviness reportedly holds government contracts with the U.S. Department of Agriculture that total over $20 million.
The OFCCP reportedly conducted a planned compliance review of both meat plants, and found the company responsible for violating Executive Order 11246 by neglecting to meet its federal contractor obligations--ensuring that all job applicants who are qualified receive employment consideration that is equal, without bias based on race, sex, color, national origin, or religion.
Under the discrimination settlement agreement, Caviness Beef Packers will pay $600,000 to the 746 class action members, which includes interest and back wages, and will offer at least 81 employment opportunities as the positions become available within the company. The company also agreed to revise its job selection process for positions within production--to steer clear from violating future equal employment opportunity obligations.
The legal authority of the OFCCP, comes from Executive Order 11246, along with the Vietnam Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973--all three of which hold all those doing business with the federal government responsible for complying to the fair and reasonable standard that they will in no way discriminate in the employment process, on the basis of sex, national origin, religion, disability color, race, or status as a protection veteran.
If you or someone you know in Orange County, California has experienced employment discrimination based on gender or race, contact our labor and employment attorneys at Howard Law, PC today, for a free consultation about your job applicant and employee rights.
Related Web Resources:
Related Blog Posts:
Tyson Fresh Meats Will Pay $2.25 M in DOL Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Settlement, California Employment Lawyers Blog, October 7, 2011
Hollywood DGA Lawyer Files Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Against Guild, California Employment Lawyers Blog, August 17, 2011
U.S. Supreme Court's Decision Sides with Wal-Mart in Sex Bias Discrimination Case, California Employment Lawyers Blog, July 6, 2011
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Wal-mart Sex-Bias Discrimination Lawsuit, California Employment Lawyers Blog, March 29, 2011
AstraZeneca to Pay $250K in Gender Discrimination Pay Lawsuit Settlement, California Employment Lawyers Blog, June 13, 2011
The EEOC and Workplace Discrimination Based on Gender, California Employment Lawyers Blog, February 11, 2011
Toshiba Sued by HR Manager for $100M in Gender Discrimination Lawsuit, California Employment Lawyers Blog, February 9, 2011
Supreme Court to Debate Class Action Certification of Wal-Mart Sex-Discrimination Case, California Employment Lawyers Blog, December 13, 2010
Wal-Mart Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Overturn Class-Action Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Ruling, California Employment Lawyers Blog, September 6, 2010
Ten Year Hollywood Age Discrimination Lawsuit Ends--Writers Entitled to Settlement, California Employment Lawyers Blog, February 9, 2010